@goc30

Oui je n’ai même pas cité "2001 l’Odyssée de l’espace", et il y aurait encore beaucoup d’autres films ou séries (Alien, Battlestar Galactica...) à citer...

Vous parlez de HAL ? "ce film décrit le maximum qu’une machine crée par l’homme, puisse faire, à savoir se rebeller contre ses géniteurs pour aller rejoindre ceux qui ont "crée" les hommes"

HAL pourrait aussi tout simplement agir selon ce que "ses géniteurs" ("authorities on Earth") lui ordonnent de faire (pas de rebellion "spirituelle" dans ce cas...) :

« Although the film leaves it mysterious, early script drafts made clear that HAL’s breakdown is triggered by authorities on Earth who order him to withhold information from the astronauts about the purpose of the mission (this is also explained in the film’s sequel 2010). Frederick Ordway, Kubrick’s science advisor and technical consultant, stated that in an earlier script Poole tells HAL there is "... something about this mission that we weren’t told. Something the rest of the crew knows and that you know. We would like to know whether this is true", to which HAL responds : "I’m sorry, Frank, but I don’t think I can answer that question without knowing everything that all of you know."[43] HAL then falsely predicts a failure of the hardware maintaining radio contact with Earth (the source of HAL’s difficult orders) during the broadcast of Frank Poole’s birthday greetings from his parents.

The final script removed this explanation, but it is hinted at when HAL asks David Bowman if Bowman is bothered by the "oddities" and "tight security" surrounding the mission. After Bowman concludes that HAL is dutifully drawing up the "crew psychology report", the computer makes his false prediction of hardware failure. Another hint occurs at the moment of HAL’s deactivation when a video reveals the purpose of the mission. »