@bubu12
 

bubu12 7 avril

But the research team warn that their findings do not show that the virus can’t be passed on by asymptomatic carriers.

Rather, strict non-pharmaceutical interventions such as mask-wearing, hand washing, social distancing and lockdown have helped reduce the virulence of Covid-19.

However, the research team say that it is important to emphasise that the results of this study should be correctly interpreted.

there is plenty of evidence elsewhere showing that people infected with Covid-19 may be temporarily asymptomatic and infectious before going on to develop symptoms.

“It’s also very important to say that these asymptomatic cases were identified shortly after the relaxation of a very stringent lockdown in Wuhan that lasted more than 70 days. By then, the epidemic in Wuhan had been effectively brought under control.

“So, it would be problematic to apply the results of our research to countries where Covid-19 outbreaks have not been successfully brought under control.

“Actually, the existence of asymptomatic cases remains a concern even in Wuhan. It is too early to be complacent, because of the existence of asymptomatic positive cases and high level of susceptibility in residents in Wuhan.

“Public health measures for the prevention and control of Covid-19 epidemic, including wearing masks, keeping safe social distancing in Wuhan should be sustained. And vulnerable populations with weakened immunity or co-morbidities, or both, should continue to be appropriately shielded.”

 

Vous êtes un cas d’école de désinformation à la Pfizer.

Afin que tout le monde se rende compte de la fraude que vous êtes je vais exposer brièvement vos techniques de désinformation à deux balles.

1. Dans votre réponse vous insérez des paragraphes en anglais ! Très bien.

Vous ne précisez pas la source, donc les lecteurs pourraient penser qu’il s’agit de citations de l’article original. (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w). Mais, c’est bien sûr FAUX !

Vous vous servez d’un article publié sur le site de l’University of East Anglia (qui reçoit de l’argent de Bill et Melinda – vous semblez avoir un attrait particulier pour eux !?) au sujet de cette étude, contenant des affirmations qui ne figurent aucunement dans l’étude elle-même.

 

2. Dans l’Abstract de l’étude on peut lire :

Stringent COVID-19 control measures were imposed in Wuhan between January 23 and April 8, 2020. Estimates of the prevalence of infection following the release of restrictions could inform post-lockdown pandemic management. Here, we describe a city-wide SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening programme between May 14 and June 1, 2020 in Wuhan. All city residents aged six years or older were eligible and 9,899,828 (92.9%) participated. No new symptomatic cases and 300 asymptomatic cases (detection rate 0.303/10,000, 95% CI 0.270–0.339/10,000) were identified. There were no positive tests amongst 1,174 close contacts of asymptomatic cases. 107 of 34,424 previously recovered COVID-19 patients tested positive again (re-positive rate 0.31%, 95% CI 0.423–0.574%). The prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Wuhan was therefore very low five to eight weeks after the end of lockdown.

 

3. Dans les Results de l’étude on peut lire :

A total of 1174 close contacts of the asymptomatic positive cases were traced, and they all tested negative for the COVID-19. […]

All asymptomatic positive cases, repositive cases and their close contacts were isolated for at least 2 weeks until the results of nucleic acid testing were negative. None of detected positive cases or their close contacts became symptomatic or newly confirmed with COVID-19 during the isolation period.

 

4. Dans la Discussion de l’étude on peut lire :

Nonetheless, it is too early to be complacent, because of the existence of asymptomatic positive cases and high level of susceptibility in residents in Wuhan. Public health measures for the prevention and control of COVID-19 epidemic, including wearing masks, keeping safe social distancing in Wuhan should be sustained. Especially, vulnerable populations with weakened immunity or co-morbidities, or both, should continue to be appropriately shielded.

 

« Wearing masks, keeping safe social distancing » ??? Avant la discussion l’étude ne fait aucune mention de masque ni de distance sociale ! Que viennent-ils faire ici ?

Au public averti ça peut rappeler une certaine méta-analyse d’un certain Andrew Hill, où les conclusions venaient corriger le tir des résultats un peu trop optimistes ! Nous avons besoin d’études plus robustes, des résultats plus solides, plus de temps…

Donc les Conclusions sont l’endroit d’intervention de Pfizer Inc. pour miner tout résultat qui pourrait encourager les gens à se faire traiter, à sortir de leurs maisons, à ne plus vivre dans la peur !

 

Et c’est également ici que les agents de cette clique de criminels, comme bubu12, viennent insérer leurs facteurs de confusion !

 

Bubu12, vous êtes un mercenaire au service d’une bande de criminels qui ont du sang sur leurs mains !