@PFIZE®baba
bubu12 : l’efficacité
est démontrée par les études de phases 3 qui sont publiées. Ce n’est pas une
nouveauté que les phases 3 soient réalisées par le fabriquant
Corollary
5 : The greater the financial and other interests and prejudices in a scientific
field, the less likely the research findings are to be true. Conflicts of interest and prejudice
may increase bias, u. Conflicts
of interest are very common in biomedical research [26],
and typically they are inadequately and sparsely reported [26,27].
Prejudice may not necessarily have financial roots. Scientists in a given field
may be prejudiced purely because of their belief in a scientific theory or
commitment to their own findings. Many otherwise seemingly independent,
university-based studies may be conducted for no other reason than to give
physicians and researchers qualifications for promotion or tenure. Such
nonfinancial conflicts may also lead to distorted reported results and
interpretations. Prestigious investigators may suppress via the peer review
process the appearance and dissemination of findings that refute their
findings, thus condemning their field to perpetuate false dogma. Empirical
evidence on expert opinion shows that it is extremely unreliable [28].