@Sentero
Tu as lu les jugements de Brann et Bibas en Pennsylvanie ? Ca vaut le détour, les juges fédéraux n’aiment pas quand on se fout de leur gueule.

Brann

"The court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations.”

(La cour) “has no authority to take away the right to vote of even a single person, let alone millions of citizens.”

“This claim, like Frankenstein’s Monster, has been haphazardly stitched together”

En appel du jugement, 3 juges républicains, dont un nommé par Trump, a écrit ceci :

Bibas et 2 collègues, tous trois républicains (appel du jugement précédent)

"Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious...Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here."

"The Campaign never alleges that any ballot was fraudulent or cast by an illegal voter"

"It never alleges that any defendant treated the Trump campaign or its votes worse than it treated the Biden campaign or its votes. Calling something discrimination does not make it so. The Second Amended Complaint still suffers from these core defects, so granting leave to amend would have been futile."